April 2006 Archives

This past week we learned that U.S. economic growth was 4.8% in the first quarter. That news by itself is positive and ought to have helped the U.S. dollar. But instead the dollar fell against major currencies.

Jennifer Ablan in Barron's wrote in an article Coming to America -- Not (subscription required) that the dollar has fallen against the euro and yen.

The dollar fell to a seven-month low against the euro and a six-month low against the yen. Higher rates make dollars more attractive, so an end to rate increases would hurt the greenback. Friday, the euro rallied to a fresh 11-month high versus the dollar above the $1.26 level during early trading in New York after a host of U.S. economic data came in under expectations. Moreover, central banks, such as Sweden, have been moving their currency reserves out of greenbacks while Russia's finance minister recently called into question the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency.

Marc Chandler, global head of currency at Brown Brothers Harriman, says adding to the euro's strength are the "strong" economic data, such as a rise in euro-zone consumer inflation this month, which raised the probabilities of a rate hike in June from the European Central Bank.

Chen Zhao of BCA Research says that petrodollars may not flow into U.S. bonds but Asian and European central banks "have to buy (the securities) in order to slow down the dollar's drop." These countries do not want their currencies to rally too much, as their economies live and die by exports. In other words, the U.S. may not experience a rerun of Seventies-style recycling in the bond markets, but that will be negated by other factors like central-bank and private-investor purchases.

If the U.S. dollar continues to fall, will that prompt Bernanke to raise rates further? But Bernanke has already hinted that the Fed might want to pause to judge the effects of the recent rate increases. So if he is forced to raise rates to defend the dollar, might he throw the economy into recession? Or would he simply allow the dollar to fall? If speculators sense that he would take the latter approach of letting the dollar fall, then speculative money will leave for other currencies.

I know that there have been a lot of doom and gloom pundits for several years calling for the U.S. dollar to decline. While these pundits have been wrong so far, their luck might change. At present I do not have a strong opinion one way or the other, but I do have exposure to commodities that should help cushion the blow if the dollar were to fall.

Recently I have been rereading George Soros's book The Alchemy of Finance (Wiley Investment Classics), which discusses currency speculation. I highly recommend reading the book because I enjoyed reading his theory on reflexivity regarding currency speculation. Soros argues that flexible exchange rates are inherently unstable, which runs counter to traditional thought taught in most universities. So I am attempting to apply what I have learned in his book to today's situation. Although I am not a currency trader or speculator, currency effects will shape how I choose to invest.

Anticipating currency moves is notoriously difficult. Soros himself suffered through poor streaks.

I have been speculating in currencies ever since they start floating, but I have failed to make money on a consistent basis. On balance, I traded profitably through 1980 and then chalked up losses between 1981 and 1985. My approach has always been tentative, based more on intuition than on conviction. By temperament, I have always been more interested in picking the turning point than in following a trend. I managed to catch both the rise adn fall of European currencies against the dollar until 1981, but I traded myself out my positions too soon. Having lost the trend, I found it too demeaning to start following the trend followers; I tried to pick the reversal point instead—needless to say, without success. I had some temporary profits in the early part of 1984, but I gave them all back. I was again engaged in a speculation against the dollar at the time I wrote this chapter (April/May 1985). Writing it has undoubtedly helped to clarify my thoughts.

Given the recent economic changes of increased interest rates, higher oil prices, moderating housing pricing, and recent weakness in the U.S. dollar, I cannot help but wonder if the U.S. will see more intensified pressure. Time will tell.

Recently AJ, who occasionally comments on this blog, asked if it was normal that a rise in a commodity price such as silver price should correspond in an equal movement in a silver related company such as Pan American Silver Corporation. I replied that there is a strong correlation, but not always day to day.

I would like to comment further. Let us consider the following stock symbols:

GLD is an excellent proxy for the price of gold. Because GLD is trust that holds gold, we can treat it as though it were gold. The remaining symbols represent gold mining companies. As an exercise, go to your favorite online stock graphing website and graph all the gold symbols listed above. Start the graph on 2 January 2005 and end at today's date. I use MSN MoneyCentral for graphing stocks.

Looking at the graph with all the stocks plotted, we note that there is a correlation between gold prices (GLD) and the gold stocks. But the correlation is not 100 percent. Sometimes the stocks underperformed relative to gold prices and other times outperformed.

Generally speaking, as the price of the commodity rises, a company should do well because its margin usually increases. But sometimes, a company has hedged its commodities or its costs rise faster than the commodity's price does. Furthermore, a company might have an increasing or decreasing production rate, depending upon its reserves and production capacity as well as other factors. Thus a company's stock price will not be perfectly correlated with a commodity's price rise.

In addition to the fundamental factors discussed above, there are also the normal noise factors in the market. Speculative forces will drive prices higher or lower. P/E multiples will expand and contract. Markets can be dismal or frothy. There can be takeovers, consolidations, and other developments that might affect the valuation.

There is a strong correlation between commodity prices and commodity stock prices. But the correlation is not a 100 percent because of both fundamentals and normal market noise. However, over the longer term, a strong commodity company will see its stock price rise along with the commodity price rise.

As a matter of disclosure, I remain long Pan American Silver stock.

Chris Flood wrote an article Silver market at a watershed in the Financial Times (subscription required).

A new cycle of buying has led to a fundamental shift in the silver market and prices could return to the boom levels of the 1980s, a leading industry consultancy has forecast.

CPM Group, the New York commodities consultant which released its 2006 Silver Yearbook yesterday, said the silver market appeared to be at a watershed.

Neither the FT article nor CPM Group website provide much detail.

Silver prices have been volatile over the past few days and there are more rumors as to when the silver ETF might become effective. Since I am not an active trader, I am not fussed one way or the other as I expect that the ETF will be soon. And I continue to believe that silver prices are headed higher.

More On Hugo Chavez

| 4 Comments | No TrackBacks

David Luhnow and Peter Millard of the Wall Street Journal wrote an interesting article Chavez Plans to Take More Control Of Oil Away From Foreign Firms (subscription required) that further reinforces my points about South America and commodities.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is planning a new assault on Big Oil, potentially taking a major step toward nationalization of Venezuela's oil industry that could hurt oil-company profits, reduce production and put further pressure on global oil prices.

Venezuela's Congress, made up entirely of Mr. Chavez's allies, is considering sharply raising taxes and royalties on foreign companies' operations in the Orinoco River basin, the country's richest oil deposit. Major oil companies like Exxon Mobil Corp. and ConocoPhillips of the U.S. and Total SA of France have invested billions of dollars there to turn the basin's characteristically tar-like oil into some 600,000 barrels a day of lighter, synthetic crude.

Mr. Chavez, a left-wing populist who favors greater state control of the economy, also wants to seize majority control of the four Orinoco projects and force private companies who run them to accept a minority stake, according to a top executive at state-run oil company Petróleos de Venezuela SA, known as PdVSA.

The U.S. will not view this latest development positively.

As I have stated in prior articles, investors need to pay attention to developments in South America because there are fundamental changes taking place where South America is shifting to the left. And investors need to pay attention to commodities. For a long time, commodities were ignored. They were cheap and plentiful. I do not believe that is the situation today.

As I write this note, silver is undergoing a large correction. According to Kitco the prices are down $1.97 tobid $12.57 $12.62 for a loss of 13.55%. While this loss is large, I believe is part of the process. Silver cannot keep going up in a straight line every day. I expect that once the loss stops, silver will go back up and surpass its previous high. And again, it might not be a straight line upward. In short, I remain bullish on silver.

Interestingly, Bill Fleckenstein at FleckensteinCapital.com warned that a correction could happen at any time. And for those that are worried, they should take some profits off the table. I am content to ride the ups and downs. My fear is that I would take something off the table only to keep watching silver go higher. I am not sure where silver will ultimately end up. But I do think it will be higher than where it is now.

One of my favorite investors Jim Rogers was quoted in a Financial Times article Precious and base metals hit new highs (subscription required).

Jim Rogers, a former partner of George Soros forecast gold would hit $1,000 a troy ounce. The man who called the commodity rally in 1999 said “supply and demand is terribly out of balance for nearly all commodities right now ... this is not a bubble.”

I agree with Rogers. I expect the prices of commodities to trend higher, although that trend will have many twists and turns.

Disclosure: I remain long Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) shares.

1   2   3   4   

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Chromasia

chromasia photoshop tutorials

Google Adsense

Amazon Recommend Business I

Amazon Recommend Photography I

Amazon Recommend General I

pair Networks

Powered by Movable Type 4.24-en

Contact

Email Subscription

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Flickr

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Stecyk. Make your own badge here.

Google Adsense

Amazon

Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha Certified

Answer Tips

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from April 2006 listed from newest to oldest.

March 2006 is the previous archive.

May 2006 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.