Potential Implications For Suncor And Syncrude Moving To A Bitumen Based Royalty

| No Comments | 1 TrackBack

Photographer Kevin H. Stecyk Model Linda T: Title Linda at Heritage Park

In today's globeandmail.com, David Ebner wrote the following:

Suncor Energy Inc. and Syncrude Canada Ltd. have individual royalty deals with the government of Alberta, which sets the two oil sands giants apart from the rest of the industry that operates under what's called a generic royalty regime in the oil sands. Suncor and Syncrude, in fact, will likely pay far lower royalties starting in 2009, regardless of how much Alberta decides to hike royalties in general.

...

Regardless, when 2009 arrives, Suncor and likely Syncrude will see their royalty burden fall as they begin to pay on cheap bitumen rather than synthetic oil. Suncor had estimated that with oil at $50 (U.S.) a barrel, it would pay about 8.5 per cent of its gross revenues as royalty in 2007-08, which could fall as low as 5 per cent in 2009-2012. Syncrude hasn't yet officially decided to make the switch.

While it is true that both companies can elect to move to a bitumen based royalty, what is not clear is whether both companies would be required to make restitution to the Alberta government for the royalty lost, inflated by the long term bond rate, because past upgrader investments were allowed as part of the cost base for royalty calculations. The companies might be required to make a choice: You can choose either to remain with the royalty based on the synthetic crude oil (SCO) as you currently are with all the benefits you derived from having the upgrader costs as part of the cost base for royalty purposes; or to move to a bitumen based royalty and pay back the royalty deductions, inflated at the long term bond rate, you received from having the upgrader costs as part of the cost base for royalty purposes. This choice, in effect, places the company on a SCO or bitumen based royalty from day one, with several years to consider the option of bitumen or SCO based royalty.

Put differently, I suspect the Alberta government might put a clawback mechanism in place to recapture the earlier benefits of having upgrader costs deductible. I will comment further on the SCO and bitumen royalty when I provide my comments on the Alberta Royalty Review.

Disclosure: I am long Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) and Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COS-UN.TO).

Model Linda T is featured in the photograph, which is hosted at Flickr. If you click on the picture of Linda, you will be taken to where you can view a larger version and see even more pictures of her.

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://speciousargument.com/cgi-bin/khsmt421/mt-tb.cgi/520

As preparation for this article, I encourage you to read my prior article about Syncrude Canada Ltd. and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) moving away from a synthetic crude oil (SCO) based royalty to a bitumen based royalty. In my... Read More

Leave a comment

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Chromasia

chromasia photoshop tutorials

Google Adsense

Amazon Recommend Business I

Amazon Recommend Photography I

Amazon Recommend General I

pair Networks

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

Contact

Email Subscription

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Flickr

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Stecyk. Make your own badge here.

Google Adsense

Amazon

Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha Certified

Answer Tips

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Stecyk published on September 27, 2007 7:00 AM.

Random Thoughts For 26 September 2007 was the previous entry in this blog.

Edmonton Model Nikki G is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.