October 2008 Archives

Copyright by Kevin H. Stecyk; Jasper National Park by Stecyk, on Flickr

James DiGiorgio recently highlighted a new and interesting blog StudioMarcotte.com by Bob Marcotte, a photographer in Fresno, California. With his latest article When Your Best Is Not Good Enough (Part 1), Bob has turned me into a loyal reader. Go and read his article, and I am sure you will become a loyal reader too.

Regardless of our methods and techniques, we’re all striving to create a soul in our images. So it would seem to be an easy task to shoot a town filled with souls. It would seem…

California is filled with millions of souls and personalities. Most of the world only hears about the fruits, flakes and nuts that make up the Granola State. I would like all of you to know that there are heroes who live here, too. They don’t get headlines. In fact, I couldn’t get these pictures or this story published by the one major newspaper or the two local magazines in Fresno. Anti-heroes get press, the story of these volunteers wasn’t considered news.

The souls I refer to are the pilots, doctors, nurses, translators and volunteers of an organization called the Flying Doctors of Mercy. I was fortunate to fly with the Fresno chapter. The short version of their story is that the first weekend of almost every month, private pilots fly their own planes filled with volunteers and supplies to impoverished towns in Mexico. Planes fly from San Diego, Los Angeles, Fresno and other cities to adopted towns deep inside Mexico … far from prosperity and medical expertise.

chromasia photoshop tutorials

Just wait to you see his picture that accompany the beginning of his article. They drip with soul. I especially love the photograph of the husband and father with his child and wife.

My photograph of Jasper National Park is hosted at Flickr. If you click on the picture, you will be taken to my Flickr account where you can see more pictures.

Canadian Election October 2008

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Copyright by Kevin H. Stecyk; Jasper National Park by Stecyk, on Flickr

According to the online website Intrade.com, the Conservative party should win a minority in the Canadian federal election on Tuesday, 14 October 2008. For those who are unfamiliar with Intrade.com, it is a website where you can place bets on outcomes on wide range of different events. For the upcoming election, Intrade.com provides the following data:

  • Conservatives winning: Bid/Ask 90.5/94;
  • Liberals winning: Bid/Ask 6/11; and
  • Another party winning: 0/1.

Note, this data changes constantly, so when you check, there might be different values.

This information means that if you believe that the Conservatives will win, you can buy a contract for $94 and if you are correct, collect $100 after the election, for a total profit of $6.00. If you are wrong, you forfeit your $94.00. If you believe that the conservatives will not win, you can short the Conservatives. If you are correct, you get to keep $90.50. If you are wrong, you will have to pay $9.50 to make $100. This simply explanation excludes transaction costs. In essence, after the election the Conservative contract is worth is $0.00 or $100.00. Your contract (or stock, if you like) with be worth either of those two values.

Like a stock, the Conservative contract value can and does change over time. You can see the graphs where Intrade shows you the historical prices. So you do not need to wait until the election is over. Rather, you can buy or sell your contract at any time until the election is decided, at which time the value of either $0.00 or $100.00.

Intrade.com also provides the following data a minority government:

  • Minority government: Bid/Ask 89.5/91.9.

If we put the two groups of data together, we conclude that the betting consensus is that Conservatives win with a minority government.

Of course, the American election is also covered on Intrade.com.

My photograph of Jasper National Park is hosted at Flickr. If you click on the picture, you will be taken to my Flickr account where you can see more pictures.

Microsoft Excel Graph - WTI Oil Price

Note: You can click through on any of the graphs to see a larger image.

The above graph shows West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil prices for about the last four years.

During the past several months, I expressed my bullishness for commodities in general and oil in particular. I remain bullish on oil, even in the face of the market meltdown. Oil demand might moderate slightly, but even the International Energy Agency forecasts slight growth in oil demand next year. IEA's 10 October 2008 highlights state the following:

Oil demand forecasts for 2008 and 2009 were trimmed by 240 kb/d and 440 kb/d, respectively, given weaker OECD deliveries and the IMF's downward revisions to 2009 global GDP assumptions. World oil demand is expected to average 86.5 mb/d in 2008 (+0.5% or +0.4 mb/d vs. 2007) and 87.2 mb/d in 2009 (+0.8% or +0.7 mb/d).

Some might be inclined to believe that high prices were their own worst enemy. That is, high prices were unsustainably high, which caused a reduction in demand and that led to lower prices. I believe, however, it was not high oil prices, but rather the financial crisis that led to lower prices.

Increasing production levels remains challenging, especially if projects are having difficulty raising sufficient financing in this current harsh environment.

With that as background, I want to focus our attention on Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Obviously, Exxon Mobil is a very complex company with many moving parts. If we had to pick a single driver, however, for value, we would all agree oil price is the most important. So using historical oil prices and share prices, I want to examine Exxon Mobil's valuation further.

Microsoft Excel Graph - Exxon Mobil Corporation: Oil Price Vs. Stock Price

Please note that I deliberately chose the end date as 29 August 2008. I wanted to exclude the recent financial turmoil from the graph. By looking at the graph, we note the predicted line is not a great fit. The data itself almost seems to exist in two clumps as shown below.

Microsoft Excel Graph - Exxon Mobil Corporation: Oil Price Vs. Stock Price With Clumps

When looking at the first clump where WTI prices range from about $40 per barrel to about $80 per barrel, we see that Exxon Mobil's stock price appears very sensitive to oil prices. And, if we look the first graph in this article, we know that these lower prices existed from 2004 through to late 2007. Now, if we look at the second clump (the two clumps overlap) of data from $60 per barrel to $150 per barrel, we see that Exxon Mobil's stock price appears almost insensitive to oil prices. Similar to our earlier observation, these higher prices existed from late 2005 onwards.

On Friday, 10 October, WTI closed at about $77.70 and XOM closed at $62.36. If we were to plot this information on the graph, the price seems to fit with the first clump in the lower portion of the graph. Note, however, the tremendous range in Exxon Mobil's stock price when oil prices are near $80 per barrel. Exxon Mobil's stock price ranges from the low $60s to the high $90s. Using this last graph alone, we could argue that the stock price is at lower end of its range.

These are, however, extraordinary times, so I would exercise caution into relying upon too heavily these graphs alone.

If we were to use just Exxon Mobil's stock price and WTI price information, how could we improve our understanding? My answer is to add the WTI futures price information. Rather than just the existing WTI price, I would add WTI futures price five years out for every WTI data point. Five years is simply a convenient timeframe. The key point is to determine whether the market is optimistic or pessimistic about future prices, and how much so.

Not long ago, the NYMEX WTI future curve exceeded $100 per barrel all along the curve. As of today (11 October 2008), the highest price is $88.83 in December 2016. Notice too that even the near month futures contracts are not plunging into the abyss. That is, the future contracts are not signaling a return to less than $50 per barrel or even less than $75 per barrel.

As mentioned at the outset, I have deliberately chosen just oil prices as my sole value driver for Exxon Mobil. Obviously, the company's valuation is much more complex than simply looking at oil prices. With that background, here are key points that we covered:

  • Future demand, according to IEA, is not falling off a cliff, but rather the growth is moderating;
  • The NYMEX curve is neither overly optimistic (above $100 per barrel) nor pessimistic (below $50 per barrel);
  • If we were to add the NYMEX information to our current data set would yield better insights because it would allow us to capture the market's view of future prices; and
  • Using just WTI oil prices and Exxon Mobil's stock prices over the last four years, Exxon Mobil's stock price appears to be at the lower end of the range.

Disclosure: I am long Exxon Mobil Corporation stock.

XDRTB.org

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

As a follow-up to my prior post on photographer James Nachtwey, I encourage you to view the video by XDRTB.org.

Thank you to James DiGiorgio, also known as JimmyD, for bringing James Nachtwey and his cause to my attention.

1

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

Chromasia

chromasia photoshop tutorials

Google Adsense

Amazon Recommend Business I

Amazon Recommend Photography I

Amazon Recommend General I

pair Networks

Powered by Movable Type 4.24-en

Contact

Email Subscription

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Flickr

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Stecyk. Make your own badge here.

Google Adsense

Amazon

Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha Certified

Answer Tips

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2008 is the previous archive.

November 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.