Specious Argument

On my old and now retired Movable Type blog, I wrote an article dated August 29, 2012, “Giving Microsoft Office 365 A Whirl.” And earlier this month, Joanna Stern of The Wall Street Journal wrote an article “Do You Really Need Microsoft Office Anymore?” (subscription required).

In my earlier article, I mentioned that although I didn’t know much about Office 365, I was willing to give it a try. One of my concerns was that I did not understand SharePoint. Although I still don’t understand it, that hasn’t stopped me from using Office 365. One of these days I will learn at least the introductory benefits of using SharePoint.

In Stern’s article, she compares some of the pros and cons of Office 365 against some free alternatives. While it’s true that most of us don’t use many or most of the features of Word and Excel, it’s likely that we all have different preferences. That is, the tools and features that you use most are likely different from those that I use.

For example, most people don’t use macros. Sometimes when working with Excel, I get neck deep into programming macros. These macros allow me to crunch numbers and produce results much faster than I otherwise could. And, they are especially helpful when the work is repetitive.

Aside from macros, I have specialized software applications that tie into Word and Excel to produce specialized documents and perform risk calculations. These applications are not required by typical users; however, I find this functionality essential.

What I like most about Office 365 is that I am already familiar with Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. And, I am learning how to use OneNote effectively. With Office 365, I have all my familiar software loaded on my desktop, laptop, and iPad. Much to my surprise and delight, Office 365 is surprisingly good. When I work on a document using my iPad, it shows up in my recent documents on my desktop computer—even better.

I mentioned that I am learning how to use OneNote more effectively. Prior to OneNote, I used a variety of methods to keep track of spurious bits of information. Now, using OneNote, I am keeping my information more organized and accessible. All my stored information on OneNote is automatically available on all devices. One feature that I appreciate is the ability to email notes into OneNote with me@onenote.com feature. Often when I am browsing the internet with my iPad, I come across information that I want to save for later. I quickly send myself an email and the item is added to the bottom of my Quick Notes. Later, I organize my information.

As an advanced user of Word, Excel and PowerPoint, I doubt that I would ever feel completely comfortable using another suite of products. Over my career I have accumulated too much knowledge to want to start over, learning something new. So coming back to Joanna Stern’s question of do I really need Office 365 anymore, my answer is a loud and resounding yes.

A couple of my favorite pastimes are following world events and the financial market. And, often the two are intertwined. Usually when there are significant adverse political developments, the market falls because of greater uncertainties and risks.

Given the backdrop of increasing geopolitical tensions, the approaching end of Fed’s Quantitative Easing in October, and the S&P 500 bumping along at almost 2000, I am surprised that the market has remained as resilient as it has over the past few months. Moreover, this past Sunday, The Wall Street Journal article “For S&P 500, Strategists’ Forecasts Fall Short” (subscription required) suggests that many strategists believe that the majority of this year’s gains have been realized.

With the market’s resilience so far, I would not be surprised by a pullback. And because we are approaching the end of the earnings season, with many investors and traders away on vacation, I do not expect stocks to go much higher in the absence of positive news. Thus, my investments remain much the same as they were before because I expect a dull and boring August.

After listening to a recent radio story about people still preferring physical books over e-books, I decided to write why I generally prefer e-books.

Having recently read several long length biographies and Russian novels using Kindle on my iPad, I found several advantages.

Perhaps most important is that while reading I am able to quickly investigate something of interest—historical facts, locations, items, words, or people. If I were reading a physical book, I likely would not stop, put the book down, and then start searching. With an e-book, I can highlight the item of interest to investigate further. Highlighting often provides more information. If that approach doesn’t work, then I can search on the internet.

With long and complex Russian novels—such as Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment (Vintage Classics) and Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina—I found the Kindle’s X-Ray feature invaluable. When I come across a character that I’ve forgotten, I can use the X-Ray feature to quickly spot where the character was mentioned. If the X-Ray feature is not available for a particular book, simply searching the book is a good substitute.

Please note that all prior links are Amazon affiliate links.

Moreover, I often like to highlight or annotate specific passages. With e-books, I can easily markup text without physically damaging the book. Later, if desired, I can simply delete my markups. With Kindle, I can easily find all my highlights and annotations.

And last, I like that my e-books are extremely portable and readable across several devices.

Even though I prefer e-books, I sometimes purchase both the e-book and a physical version.

Those are my reasons for generally preferring e-books over physical books. Regardless of whether you prefer to read an e-book or physical book, it’s great to read.

After having read and reviewed Robert K. Massie’s books Peter the Great: His Life and World (Modern Library) and Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman, I recently finished the remaining two books in the series: Nicholas and Alexandra (Modern Library) and The Romanovs: The Final Chapter (Modern Library). In this article, I will briefly review the last two books.

Please note that all prior links are Amazon affiliate links.

The first book detailed the lives of Nicholas and Alexandra. As I began reading, I had an uncomfortable sense of foreboding. I knew that their lives ended in tragedy with their assassinations in Ekaterinburg in 1918. So, as I read through the book, I knew that all the events led to one unfortunate conclusion.

As I read through all these biographies, I tended to identify with the characters. When I read about Peter the Great, I traveled back in time and was with him during his accomplishments and festivities. Along with him, I suffered his defeats and celebrated his victories. Similarly with Catherine the Great, I suffered along with her during her hardships, especially at the beginning of her career, and then I celebrated her accomplishments during her reign.

Reading about Nicholas and Alexandra, my feelings were much different, because instead of a leader who overcame his challenges, this story was about a leader and his family who eventually succumbed to their challenges. Moreover, in the prior biographies, I romanticized about a period in time where there were few conveniences. During the times of Peter and Catherine, horses were used for travel and letters for communication. In Nicholas’s reign, trains, cars, and planes began to complement and replace horses. Electricity was commonly used, with the added benefit of better night lighting. And, the telegraph was used for fast communication. Some of the romanticism of earlier life was replaced by the common familiarity of more modern conveniences.

I was also struck by the recency of the era of Nicholas and Alexandra. Reaching back into history, it’s as if my fingertips are almost able to touch some of those who knew or saw Nicholas and Alexandra. For example, George Balanchine, one of the twentieth century’s most prolific and famous choreographers and well-known choreographer for the New York City Ballet, performed as a young child before the royal couple. I was already alive when Balanchine died in 1983, which is not that long ago. Most of the prominent characters, however, were adults during Nicholas’s reign and died earlier, before I was born.

Nicholas’s life was filled with challenges that he was never able to overcome. His father, Alexander III, died too young at age forty-nine, long before he had an opportunity to teach his young, inexperienced, twenty-six year old son Nicholas II all that he needed to know and understand to govern Russia. Nicholas married Alexandra, a woman that he truly loved from Germany. Together they had four beautiful daughters, Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia, followed by one son, Alexei. Unfortunately, Alexandra carried a gene that led to Alexei being cursed with hemophilia, a disease that prevents from the blood from clotting in a regular and timely fashion.

Prior to reading this book, I had no clue about this awful disease. For small children during that period, this disease was especially cruel. While ordinary kids often got bumps and bruises that quickly healed, hemophiliacs suffered a much worse fate when bruised. Their blood didn’t clot easily. Instead, the unconstrained bleeding led to internal swelling that affected their joints, often immobilizing limbs. Hemophiliac kids cried out in extreme pain, begging their parents to help them, yet there was nothing that could be done. For young Alexei, he sometimes spent long periods unable to walk.

During Alexei’s painful periods, Alexandra took solace from a man named Rasputin. Rasputin was an enigmatic, Janus-faced peasant who showed the Romanovs a religious, caring side of his personality, while he showed others his more eccentric and aggressive personality. When he was with the Romanovs, he was able to provide Alexandra with often prophetic words of wisdom that comforted her as she cared for her son. More important, however, was that he was able to calm everyone, which helped Alexei when the doctors were powerless to help. The significance of remaining calm was that Alexei had a better chance that his blood would clot and stop the internal hemorrhaging. Because Alexei often got better, Alexandra saw Rasputin as a savior, her conduit to God.

Switching away from Nicholas the sovereign to Nicholas the husband and father, I found striking differences between Nicholas and his predecessors Peter and Catherine. Nicholas was very much a family man. During his marriage with his wife, they exchanged over six hundred letters, and their letters remained warm, loving, and intimate throughout their marriage. He cared deeply and passionately about his children, perhaps with special attention to Alexei because of his illness and because of his special role as heir. My impressions of Peter and Catherine is that for each of them, their greatest loves were their roles as sovereigns while families and romantic partners came a close second.

Just focusing on Nicholas, I have two trains of thoughts. First, he was a weak leader, most probably because he went from having no particular roles or responsibilities prior to his father’s death to assuming the role as sovereign of Russia in only a heartbeat. Very few could make such a dramatic transition successfully. Moreover, others claim that he was indecisive and unable to stick to his decisions. As a result of being an indecisive and weak leader, events seemed to shape his destiny. And second, as a person, he was charming, extremely considerate, man who cared deeply about his faith, family, and country. I was left with the impression that Nicholas was a likeable person who found all the stars aligned against himself. As a leader and as a person, he simply had too many unfortunate circumstances to overcome.

At the end of the book, I read about the tragic events that took place at Ekaterinburg’s Ipatiev House, which was called The House of Special Purpose. On 17 July 1918, Nicholas carried his son from upstairs to the cellar, where he and his son along with his wife and four daughters and three others—Trupp, valet; Demidova, Alexandra’s maid; and Kharitonov, cook—were executed. After the execution, the bodies were hastily buried near one of Ekaterinburg’s mine sites.

The first book Nicholas and Alexandra was written at about 1967, when the Soviet Union still ruled Russia. At that time, some information was unavailable. The second book The Romanovs: The Final Chapter was written in 1995, a few years after the break-up of the Soviet Union, when more information was discovered and became available.

The Second book, The Romanovs: The Final Chapter is divided into three main parts. First, I learned greater detail of their execution. The book discussed discovery of the bones of the deceased. Once the bones were discovered, there was considerable confusion among scientists and competing claims between government entities. There were Russian, American, and British scientists who all worked, though not always harmoniously, toward identifying the remains. And, both Moscow and Ekaterinburg claimed rights to the remains. After the book was published, I learned that Moscow eventually won and that the remains were interred at St. Peter and Paul Cathedral in Saint Petersburg on 17 July 1998, eighty years after the executions. And, I believe that all remains, including those of the servants, are together.

The first part also goes into the DNA science and government squabbling in great detail. I just wanted to know the conclusions.

The second part of the book discusses a Polish woman who represented herself as Anastasia, one of Nicholas’s daughters. Once again, the book goes into considerable detail about her life and those that interacted with her in trying to assess her claim of being Anastasia. In the end, I learned that she was a peasant woman from Poland. As she had been in sanatoriums, she might have been mentally ill and sincerely believed that she was Anastasia. Again, I had little interest in all the details. All I wanted to know was the conclusion.

And the last part of the book discussed where some of the still living Romanovs are now. Some are living in obscurity while others have achieved prominence in their fields.

Robert K. Massie is a superb historian and author. With all the rich detail packed into each book, I can only begin to fully appreciate all his efforts to research and chronicle the lives of the Romanov dynasty. What an incredible reading journey I have enjoyed.